Jul 26, 2026SAMSUNG-PHONE-0205Never settled

Samsung was reported developing a successor to its first tri-fold

Samsung has begun early development of a successor to its first-generation tri-folding Galaxy phone.

An unnamed source reported that Samsung had begun early development of a successor to its first-generation tri-folding Galaxy phone. This record tracks that reported development work.

How to read this record

  1. What was reportedSamsung has begun early development of a successor to its first-generation tri-folding Galaxy phone.
  2. Who said it, and whenIt was reported on Jul 26, 2026 in ETNews, and we could not tell who reported it first.
  3. What happened, and whenWe have not confirmed when Samsung was announced.
  4. The verdict, and whyNever settledThe company has announced the product and nobody ever confirmed or denied this.No reason has been written for this verdict.
What do these words mean?
Right
It turned out the way this report said.
Partly right
Some of this was right and some of it was not.
Wrong
It did not turn out this way.
Moving target
This was right about the plan at the time. The company then changed it.
Never settled
The company has announced the product and nobody ever confirmed or denied this.
Not comparable
This measured a different thing from the number the company published, so the two cannot be compared.
No outcome yet
Nothing has happened yet that would prove this right or wrong.
Not checked yet
The company has answered this. We have not finished checking this one.
Checked
Checked means the company has since given an answer and we compared it with what was reported. Details still waiting on an answer, details nothing can settle, details where the plan itself changed, and details we have not finished reviewing are all counted separately and are not part of that number.
Moving target
A moving target is a report that described the plan accurately at the time, on a product the company then changed. We count these on their own: it would flatter a reporter to call them right, and it would blame a reporter for a decision that was not theirs to call them wrong.
Reported by
Unnamed source
We read it in
ETNews
Product
Samsung