Dec 12, 2022G2-068Never settled
Abner Li: Google explores ring and wrist controls
Abner Li and Kyle Bradshaw reported that Google was exploring both ring-based and wrist-based controls for smart glasses.
Abner Li reported that Google was exploring both ring-based and wrist-based controls for its smart glasses efforts, though it was unclear which AR project would use them, per 9to5Google.
How to read this record
- What was reportedAbner Li and Kyle Bradshaw reported that Google was exploring both ring-based and wrist-based controls for smart glasses.
- Who said it, and whenAbner Li reported it on Dec 12, 2022 in 9to5Google.
- What happened, and whenWe have not confirmed when Google smart glasses was announced.
- The verdict, and whyNever settledThe company has announced the product and nobody ever confirmed or denied this.Why: No released Google smart-glasses product has yet settled which control scheme, if any, survived development.
What do these words mean?
- Right
- It turned out the way this report said.
- Partly right
- Some of this was right and some of it was not.
- Wrong
- It did not turn out this way.
- Moving target
- This was right about the plan at the time. The company then changed it.
- Never settled
- The company has announced the product and nobody ever confirmed or denied this.
- Not comparable
- This measured a different thing from the number the company published, so the two cannot be compared.
- No outcome yet
- Nothing has happened yet that would prove this right or wrong.
- Not checked yet
- The company has answered this. We have not finished checking this one.
- Checked
- Checked means the company has since given an answer and we compared it with what was reported. Details still waiting on an answer, details nothing can settle, details where the plan itself changed, and details we have not finished reviewing are all counted separately and are not part of that number.
- Moving target
- A moving target is a report that described the plan accurately at the time, on a product the company then changed. We count these on their own: it would flatter a reporter to call them right, and it would blame a reporter for a decision that was not theirs to call them wrong.
- Reported by
- Abner Li
- We read it in
- 9to5Google
- Product
- Google smart glasses